February102011
She has an awfully pretty face, the use of colour in this image is beautiful, and I love the retro ’50s styling, but:Her pants are too small.She should not be wearing her shirt tied up until she does some work on her stomach.Were she to actually dress like this in the 1950s, she would be considered quite an indecent hussy. I do not think that ‘indecent hussy’ was what the creators of this image were going for.

She has an awfully pretty face, the use of colour in this image is beautiful, and I love the retro ’50s styling, but:
Her pants are too small.
She should not be wearing her shirt tied up until she does some work on her stomach.
Were she to actually dress like this in the 1950s, she would be considered quite an indecent hussy. I do not think that ‘indecent hussy’ was what the creators of this image were going for.

(via sistercircleconfessions-deactiv)

June212011
July212011
Is this supposed to be some sort of parody of all those overexposed pictures of skinny girls looking off into the distance? Those are dumb pictures either way, but this just adds a layer of gross onto the stupidity. Please honey, cover up. No-one wants to see all that.

Is this supposed to be some sort of parody of all those overexposed pictures of skinny girls looking off into the distance? Those are dumb pictures either way, but this just adds a layer of gross onto the stupidity. Please honey, cover up. No-one wants to see all that.

(Source: bmcay, via fatshopaholic)

Page 1 of 1